Palavras-chave
Women
Elementary Education
Resumo
This study analyses the representation of women in Spanish primary school mathematics textbooks, from the transition period to the present. Its aim is to assess the extent to which these materials challenge or reinforce gender stereotypes, understood as generalized views of the attributes and roles ascribed to women and men. The research is grounded in the premise that the visibility of female role models in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) is essential to fostering equal opportunities from an early age and expanding the career horizons of girls and young women. To this end, twelve mathematics textbooks are examined through a mixed methodology that considers both the frequency and the context of male and female character appearances in texts and illustrations. The findings indicate a relative numerical balance in the representation of men and women in more recent textbooks; however, a significant qualitative imbalance remains. Female figures are less frequently linked to scientific or technological fields, are more often portrayed in traditional social roles, and at times appear less confident or competent than their male counterparts. Such biased representation perpetuates gender stereotypes that may undermine girls’ self-esteem and restrict their academic and professional ambitions. The study concludes by stressing the importance of teachers adopting a critical, co-educational approach in the selection and use of teaching materials, thereby promoting more inclusive education and helping to reduce persistent gender gaps in scientific training.Referências
Agulló, M. C., y Payà, A. (2025). La transición en la escuela una escuela en transición (1970-1990). Octaedro.
Alam, M. M. (2013). A study of test anxiety, self-esteem and academic performance among adolescents. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(4), 33–43.
Almodóvar, J. A., et al. (2019). Mate + Matemáticas para pensar 5 Primaria. Santillana.
Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 719–747. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6<719::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-R.
Balbé, A., Botelho, C., & Cabecinhas, R. (2023). Mulheres cientistas? A representação das mulheres na ciência nos livros didáticos de história em Portugal. Cadernos pagu, (67), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/18094449202300670011.
Ballarín, P. (2001). La educación de las mujeres en la España contemporánea (siglos XIX y XX). Síntesis.
Bandura, A. (1987). Teoría del aprendizaje social. Espasa-Calpe.
Beilock, S. L., & Maloney, E. A. (2015). Math anxiety: A factor in math achievement not to be ignored. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601438.
Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., y Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), 1860–1863. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910967107.
Bernabéu, J., et al. (2014). Matemáticas 3. Proyecto Savia. SM.
Bian, L., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524.
Blatchford, P. (2003). The class size debate: Is small better? Open University Press.
Blumberg, R.L. (2008). The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks. Prospects, 38, 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1.
Charles, M., Harr, B., Cech, E., & Hendley, A. (2014). Who likes math where? Gender differences in eighth-graders’ attitudes around the world. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.895140.
Chassot, A. I. (2019). A ciência é masculina? É sim senhora! Unisinos.
Commeyras, M. (2010). Reading about women in world history textbooks from one feminist perspective. Gender and Education, 8(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/713668481.
Covacevich, C., & Quintela-Dávila, G. (2014). Desigualdad de género: El currículum oculto en textos escolares chilenos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math–gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82(3), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x.
De la Torre-Sierra, A. M., & Guichot-Reina, V. (2022). The influence of school textbooks on the configuration of gender identity: A study on the unequal representation of women and men in the school discourse during the Spanish democracy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 103810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103810.
Eccles, J. S. (1983). Female achievement patterns: Attributions, expectancies, values, and choice. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 1–22.
Eccles, J. S. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398185.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1997). Motivation to succeed. En W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 1017–1095). Wiley.
Escolano, A. (2002). The historical codification of the manualistics in Spain. Paedagogica Historica, 38(1), 57–72.
European Commission. (2025). She figures: Gender in research and innovation. European Commission.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Fávero, M. H. (2010). Psicologia do gênero. Estudos Feministas, 20(2), 587–592.
Ferrero, L., et al. (2015). Matemáticas 5. Anaya.
Frankestein, M. (1983). Critical mathematics education. Journal of Education, 165(4), 315–339.
Gil, J., & Mascaró, J. (1982). Matemáticas 5º EGB. Santillana.
Giroux, H. (1984). Ideology, culture, and the process of schooling. Temple University Press.
Gonçalves, B., & de Souza Mello, S. P. L. (2023). O reconhecimento da mulher nos livros didáticos de Química: uma análise das edições de 2015 e 2018 do PNLD. Amazônia: Revista de Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas, 19(43), 188-201.
González-González, J.-M., Bel, J. C., Colomer Rubio, J. C., & Rivero, P. (2024). La investigación sobre el uso del libro de texto de Ciencias Sociales, Geografía e Historia en España: una revisión sistemática. Revista Complutense de Educación, 35(2), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.85747.
Guichot Reina, V., & Torre Sierra, A. M. D. L. (2020). Identidad profesional y socialización de género: un estudio desde la manualística escolar en la España democrática. Historia y Memoria de la Educación, 12, 101-136. https://doi.org/10.5944/hme.12.2020.25599.
Guichot-Reina, V., & De la Torre-Sierra, A. M. (2023). The representation of gender stereotypes in Spanish mathematics textbooks for elementary education. Sexuality & Culture, 27(4), 1481-1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10075-1.
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., & Gernscbacher, M. A. (2007). The sciences of sex differences. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
Hamid, B., Yasin, M., Bakar, K. A., Keong, Y. C., & Jalaluddin, A- (2008). Linguistic sexism and gender role stereotyping. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 45–78.
Hildebrand, L., Posid, T., Moss-Racusin, C. A, Hymes, L., & Cordes, S. (2023). Does my daughter like math? Relations between parent and child math attitudes and beliefs. Developmental Science, 26(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13243.
Incikabi, L., & Ulusoy, F. (2019). Gender bias and stereotypes in mathematics textbooks. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(4), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.581802.
Jehle, A. M. C., Groeneveld, M. G., Van de Rozenberg, T. M., & Mesman, J. (2024). The hidden lessons in textbooks: Gender representation and stereotypes in European mathematics and language books. European Journal of Education, 59(4), e12716. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12716.
Jiménez-Cortés, R. (2019). Investigación educativa con perspectiva de género. Aula Magna.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014.
Keller, C. (2010). Effect of teachers’ stereotyping. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600544.
Laureano, H. M., Teixeira, J., Santana, K., Spesia, S. A., & de Bastiani, J. (2023). A representatividade feminina nos livros didáticos. Revista Foco, 16(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.54751/revistafoco.v16n5-129.
Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816.
Le Roux, K. (2008). Critical discourse analysis in mathematics. Language and Education, 22(5), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152663
Lee, J. F. K., & Mahmoudi-Gahrouei, V. (2020). Gender representation in instructional materials. Sexuality & Culture, 24, 1107–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09747-z.
Litosseliti, L., & Sunderland, J. (2002). Gender identity and discourse analysis. En J. Sunderland & L. Litosseliti (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 3–43). John Benjamins.
López-Navajas, A. M. (2015). Las mujeres que nos faltan (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Valencia.
Medina, G. et al. (2013). Matemáticas 5. SM.
Midgley, C., Lockwood, P., & Hu, L. Y. (2023). Maximizing women's motivation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231156165.
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades. (2024). Mujeres e Innovación. Secretaría General Técnica Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades.
Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. (2020). Estudio Internacional de Tendencias en Matemáticas y Ciencias. TIMSS 2019. Catálogo de publicaciones del Ministerio.
Myint, E. T., y Robnett, R. D. (2024). Correlates of adolescents’ STEM career aspirations: The importance of academic motivation, academic identity, and gender. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00681-w.
Naciones Unidas. (2022). Gender Stereotyping. https://www.ohchr.org/en/women/gender-stereotyping.
OCDE. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education. OECD Publishing.
OCDE. (2020). The future at five. OECD.
Oehl, W., y Palzkill. (1983). El mundo del número. Didascalia.
OEI (2021). El estado de la ciencia. Principales indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Iberoamericanos. RICYT.
Passolunghi, M. C., Rueda Ferreira, T. I., & Tomasetto, C. (2014). Math–gender stereotypes and math-related beliefs in childhood and early adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.005.
Pichel, J. M., & Villarino, J. A. (1984). Tobogán 3. Cincel.
Ramos, A., Gil, J., y García, P. (1988). Matemáticas 3º EGB. Santillana.
Reguera, M. P. et al. (2019). Mate + Matemáticas para pensar 3. Santillana.
Ruiz-Cecilia, R., Guijarro-Ojeda, J. R., & Marín-Macías, C. (2021). Analysis of heteronormativity and gender roles in EFL Textbooks. Sustainability, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010220.
Setyono, B. (2018). The portrayal of women in nationally-endorsed English as a Foreign Language (EFL) textbooks for Senior High School students in Indonesia. Sexuality and Culture, 22(4), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9526-2.
Shibley, J., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and affect, a Meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quaterly, 14(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x
Shin, J. E. L., & Levy, S. R. (2016). Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non-STEM student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12371.
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P., & Eccles, J. (2006). Math and science motivation. A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70.
Smetáčková, I., & Rubín, T. (2015). When girls compare themselves to boys: Activation of gender stereotype and achievement in mathematics in czech schools. Ceskoslovenská Psychologie, 59(6), 521–533.
Subirats, M. (1993). El sexismo en los libros de texto: análisis y propuesta de un sistema de indicadores. Instituto de la Mujer
Táboas-Pais, M. I., & Rey-Cao, A. (2012). Gender differences in Physical Education Textbooks in Spain: A content analysis of photographs. Sex Roles, 67, 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0174-y.
Tyarakanita, A., Drajati, N. A., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Nurkamto, J. (2021). The representation of gender stereotypes in indonesian English Language Textbooks. Sexuality & Culture, 25, 1140–1157. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09813-0
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report. UNESCO.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001
World Economic Forum. (2024). Global gender gap report. World Economic Forum.
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Virginia Guichot-Reina, Ana María de la Torre-Sierra